Why does Kant Think that Democracy is Necessarily Despotic?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Kant’s criticism of democracy has been traditionally defused with the consideration that aversion is not to per se, but direct democracy. However, what Kant says – ‘to prevent republican constitution from being confused democratic one, as commonly happens’ ( ZeF , 8: 351) appears count only against democracy, also conceptions closer ones we are accustomed to. By offering a new account sees real problem (direct or not), article unpacks lesson about limits gone largely unnoticed among political theorists and specialists.
منابع مشابه
Why Does Kant Think That Moral Requirements Are Categorical Imperatives?
In this paper I put forth three criticisms against McDowell account of the idea that moral requirements are categorical imperatives. I argue that McDowell’s account fails as a defense of Kant’s doctrine for at least three reasons. First, McDowell claims that agents can appeal to experience in order to formulate and recognize categorical imperatives. However, Kant strongly disagrees with this cl...
متن کاملFaculty burnout: Does anyone think of that?
Background: Job burnout is one of the factors that decrease the productivity of university faculty members. This is important for teachers who are a critical element of the educational system. Failure to pay attention to environmental and organizational factors as well as psychological and personality traits in professors will lead to adverse effects on their mental health, inc...
متن کاملWhy God Cannot Think: Kant, Omnipresence, & Consciousness
It has been argued that God is omnipresent, that is, present in all places and in all times. Omnipresence is also implied by God's knowledge, power, and perfection. A Kantian argument shows that in order to be self-aware, apply concepts, and form judgments, in short, to have a mind, there must be objects that are external to a being that it can become aware of and grasp itself in relationship t...
متن کاملWhy Believe That There Is a God?
This article presents an argument for the existence of God, showing that the evident phenomena are best explained by supposing that a God causes them. The argument is based on the inductive force of four very evident general phenomena: that there is a physical Universe; that it is governed by very simple natural laws; that those laws are such as to lead to the existence of human bodies; and tha...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Kantian Review
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2044-2394', '1369-4154']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415423000110